Intel Core i5-8250U vs Intel Core i7-4810MQ
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i5-8250U und Intel Core i7-4810MQ Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-8250U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 3.1x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 47 Watt
- Etwa 86% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.131 vs 14.574
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 280.161 vs 75.189
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.755 vs 0.534
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.947 vs 3.864
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 1130
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3199 vs 2018
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5401 vs 3558
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 1130
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3199 vs 2018
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5401 vs 3558
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 21 August 2017 vs 19 January 2014 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.131 vs 14.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 280.161 vs 75.189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.755 vs 0.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.947 vs 3.864 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 vs 1130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 vs 2018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5401 vs 3558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 vs 1130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 vs 2018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5401 vs 3558 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Etwa 12% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.80 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2027 vs 1889
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 6067 vs 5826
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 860 vs 770
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3029 vs 2911
- 4x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 6733 vs 1696
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.653 vs 30.385
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.80 GHz vs 3.40 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2027 vs 1889 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6067 vs 5826 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 860 vs 770 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3029 vs 2911 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 6733 vs 1696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.653 vs 30.385 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-8250U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4810MQ
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-8250U | Intel Core i7-4810MQ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1889 | 2027 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5826 | 6067 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 770 | 860 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2911 | 3029 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1696 | 6733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.131 | 14.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 280.161 | 75.189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.755 | 0.534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.947 | 3.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.385 | 41.653 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | 1130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 2018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5401 | 3558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | 1130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 2018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5401 | 3558 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i5-8250U | Intel Core i7-4810MQ | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Kaby Lake R | Haswell |
| Startdatum | 21 August 2017 | 19 January 2014 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $297 | $378 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 986 | 1513 |
| Processor Number | i5-8250U | i7-4810MQ |
| Serie | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Jetzt kaufen | $424.95 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 5.99 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Matrizengröße | 123 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.40 GHz | 3.80 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1400 Million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 34.1 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR3L 1333/1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x5917 | 0x416 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.30 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.3 GHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.80 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 42mm X 24mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm x 4.7mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FC-BGA1356 | FCPGA946 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 47 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 12 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i5-8250U mit anderen
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
IntelCore i7-6650U
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
IntelCore i7-7820HQ
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
AMDRX-418GD
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
IntelCore i3-1115G4E
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
AMDRyzen 3 7320U
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
AMDAthlon Gold 7220U
