Intel Core i7-5557U vs Intel Core i5-5300U
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i7-5557U und Intel Core i5-5300U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-5557U
- Etwa 17% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.40 GHz vs 2.90 GHz
- Etwa {Prozent}% mehr L3 Cache; weitere Daten können im Cache L3 gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1916 vs 1635
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3096 vs 2735
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 827 vs 635
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1802 vs 1349
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.936 vs 0.956
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 43.279 vs 18.944
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.279 vs 0.08
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.13 vs 0.74
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.964 vs 2.079
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1425 vs 1120
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1425 vs 1120
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.40 GHz vs 2.90 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB vs 3 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1916 vs 1635 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3096 vs 2735 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 827 vs 635 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1802 vs 1349 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.936 vs 0.956 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 43.279 vs 18.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.279 vs 0.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.13 vs 0.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.964 vs 2.079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1425 vs 1120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1425 vs 1120 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-5300U
- Etwa 87% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2143 vs 1545
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3472 vs 2859
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2143 vs 1545
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3472 vs 2859
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2143 vs 1545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3472 vs 2859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2143 vs 1545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3472 vs 2859 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-5557U
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-5300U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-5557U | Intel Core i5-5300U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1916 | 1635 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3096 | 2735 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 827 | 635 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1802 | 1349 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.936 | 0.956 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 43.279 | 18.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.279 | 0.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.13 | 0.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.964 | 2.079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1425 | 1120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1545 | 2143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2859 | 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1425 | 1120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1545 | 2143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2859 | 3472 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i7-5557U | Intel Core i5-5300U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Broadwell | Broadwell |
| Startdatum | 6 January 2015 | 5 January 2015 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $426 | $281 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2010 | 2011 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $705 | $515.73 |
| Processor Number | i7-5557U | i5-5300U |
| Serie | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 2.06 | 2.17 |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 2.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Matrizengröße | 133 mm | 82 mm |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 3 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C | 105°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.40 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1900 Million | 1300 Million |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1600/1866 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x162B | 0x1616 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 900 MHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.1 GHz | 900 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® Iris® Graphics 6100 | Intel® HD Graphics 5500 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | 2560X1600@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 23 W | 7.5 W |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 40mm x24mm x 1.3mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.3mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1168 | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 12 | 12 |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 4x1, 2x4 | 4x1, 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i7-5557U mit anderen
IntelCore i7-5557U vs
IntelCore i3-3120M
IntelCore i7-5557U vs
IntelCore i7-4510U
IntelCore i7-5557U vs
IntelCore i5-5300U
IntelCore i7-5557U vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCore i7-5557U vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore i7-5557U vs
AMDR-272F
