Intel Core i7-5775R vs Intel Core i5-4670
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i7-5775R und Intel Core i5-4670 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-5775R
- 4 Mehr Kanäle: 8 vs 4
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Etwa 29% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 65 Watt vs 84 Watt
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2252 vs 2136
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 7609 vs 5494
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 984 vs 881
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3895 vs 2829
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.367 vs 3.854
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 98.256 vs 76.671
- Etwa 76% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.732 vs 0.415
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.6 vs 2.164
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.67 vs 6.241
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2707 vs 1136
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2707 vs 1136
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 vs 4 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 84 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2252 vs 2136 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7609 vs 5494 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 984 vs 881 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3895 vs 2829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.367 vs 3.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 98.256 vs 76.671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.732 vs 0.415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.6 vs 2.164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.67 vs 6.241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2707 vs 1136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2707 vs 1136 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-4670
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2584 vs 1180
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1673
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2584 vs 1180
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1673
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2584 vs 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2584 vs 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 1673 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-5775R
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4670
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-5775R | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2252 | 2136 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7609 | 5494 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 984 | 881 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3895 | 2829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.367 | 3.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 98.256 | 76.671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.732 | 0.415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.6 | 2.164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.67 | 6.241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2707 | 1136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1180 | 2584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1673 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2707 | 1136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1180 | 2584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1673 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2991 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i7-5775R | Intel Core i5-4670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Broadwell | Haswell |
| Startdatum | Q2'15 | June 2013 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1710 | 1698 |
| Processor Number | i7-5775R | i5-4670 |
| Serie | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $360 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $187.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 11.65 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.30 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.80 GHz | 3.80 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 4 |
| Matrizengröße | 177 mm | |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 72.72°C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1400 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 29.86 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L-1333/1600/1866 @ 1.5V | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x1622 | 0x412 |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.2 GHz | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | 1920x1200@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1364 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCA 2013D | PCG 2013D |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i7-5775R mit anderen
IntelCore i7-5775R vs
AMDPhenom II X4 805
IntelCore i7-5775R vs
AMDAthlon II X4 615e
IntelCore i7-5775R vs
AMDA10-5700
IntelCore i7-5775R vs
IntelCore i3-4340
IntelCore i7-5775R vs
IntelCore i3-7100
IntelCore i7-5775R vs
IntelCore i5-4690T
