Intel Core i7-7Y75 vs Intel Core i5-6260U
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i7-7Y75 und Intel Core i5-6260U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-7Y75
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 0 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 24% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.60 GHz vs 2.90 GHz
- 3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 3180 vs 691
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 5432 vs 1556
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.556 vs 2.51
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3831 vs 3360
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3831 vs 3360
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 30 August 2016 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.60 GHz vs 2.90 GHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 3180 vs 691 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5432 vs 1556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.556 vs 2.51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3831 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3831 vs 3360 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-6260U
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1651 vs 1572
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3207 vs 2614
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.151 vs 2.09
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 41.792 vs 37.302
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.28 vs 0.258
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.026 vs 0.914
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2275 vs 1167
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3649 vs 2279
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2275 vs 1167
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3649 vs 2279
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1651 vs 1572 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3207 vs 2614 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.151 vs 2.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 41.792 vs 37.302 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.28 vs 0.258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.026 vs 0.914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2275 vs 1167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 vs 2279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2275 vs 1167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 vs 2279 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-7Y75
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-6260U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-7Y75 | Intel Core i5-6260U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1572 | 1651 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2614 | 3207 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 3180 | 691 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5432 | 1556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.09 | 2.151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 37.302 | 41.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.258 | 0.28 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.914 | 1.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.556 | 2.51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1167 | 2275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 | 3649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3831 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1167 | 2275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 | 3649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3831 | 3360 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i7-7Y75 | Intel Core i5-6260U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Kaby Lake | Skylake |
| Startdatum | 30 August 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $393 | $304 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1466 | 1457 |
| Processor Number | i7-7Y75 | i5-6260U |
| Serie | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Jetzt kaufen | $518.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 2.48 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.30 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 4 GT/s OPI |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.60 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 29.8 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x591E | 0x1926 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 950 MHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.05 GHz | 950 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 615 | Intel® Iris® Graphics 540 |
| eDRAM | 64 MB | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | N / A | |
| Maximale Auflösung über WiDi | 1080p | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 3.5 W | 9.5 W |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 7 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.60 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 20.5mm X 16.5mm | 42x24x1.3 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1515 | FCBGA1356 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 10 | 12 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i7-7Y75 mit anderen
IntelCore i7-7Y75 vs
IntelCore i3-4000M
IntelCore i7-7Y75 vs
IntelCore i7-6822EQ
IntelCore i7-7Y75 vs
AMDRX-427BB
IntelCore i7-7Y75 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
IntelCore i7-7Y75 vs
IntelCore i5-L16G7
IntelCore i7-7Y75 vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
