Intel Core i7-8559U vs Intel Core i7-7820HK
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i7-8559U und Intel Core i7-7820HK Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-8559U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 15% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.50 GHz vs 3.90 GHz
- Etwa 61% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 28 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2541 vs 2117
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 8447 vs 7400
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1095 vs 1003
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.705 vs 0.691
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.125 vs 6.316
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3326 vs 1720
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7195 vs 5705
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3326 vs 1720
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7195 vs 5705
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 3 April 2018 vs 3 January 2017 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.50 GHz vs 3.90 GHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2541 vs 2117 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8447 vs 7400 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1095 vs 1003 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.254 vs 5.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.705 vs 0.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.125 vs 6.316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3326 vs 1720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7195 vs 5705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3326 vs 1720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7195 vs 5705 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-7820HK
- Der Prozessor ist entsperrt, ein entsperrter Multiplikator ermöglicht eine einfachere Übertaktung
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3955 vs 3731
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 85.638 vs 77.721
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.65 vs 2.461
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3147 vs 1285
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3147 vs 1285
| Spezifikationen | |
| Freigegeben | Freigegeben vs Gesperrt |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3955 vs 3731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.638 vs 77.721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.65 vs 2.461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3147 vs 1285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3147 vs 1285 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-8559U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-7820HK
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-8559U | Intel Core i7-7820HK |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2541 | 2117 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8447 | 7400 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1095 | 1003 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3731 | 3955 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 4200 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.254 | 5.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.721 | 85.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.705 | 0.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.461 | 2.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.125 | 6.316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3326 | 1720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1285 | 3147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7195 | 5705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3326 | 1720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1285 | 3147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7195 | 5705 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i7-8559U | Intel Core i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Coffee Lake | Kaby Lake |
| Startdatum | 3 April 2018 | 3 January 2017 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1211 | 1232 |
| Processor Number | i7-8559U | i7-7820HK |
| Serie | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $378 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.70 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 8 GT/s DMI |
| Matrizengröße | 123 mm | |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.50 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 8 |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 37.5 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x3EA5 | 0x591B |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® Iris® Plus Graphics 655 | Intel® HD Graphics 630 |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.1 GHz | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@30Hz | 4096x2304@30Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | N / A | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 20 W | 35 W |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 46x24 | 42mm x 28mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1440 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 28 Watt | 45 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i7-8559U mit anderen
IntelCore i7-8559U vs
IntelCeleron 2970M
IntelCore i7-8559U vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1606G
IntelCore i7-8559U vs
IntelCore i5-10200H
IntelCore i7-8559U vs
IntelN200
IntelCore i7-8559U vs
AMDAthlon PRO 300U
IntelCore i7-8559U vs
AMDAthlon Silver 7120U
