Intel Core i7-9700KF vs AMD PRO A10-9700E
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i7-9700KF und AMD PRO A10-9700E Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-9700KF
- 4 mehr Kerne, mehr Anwendungen auf einmal ausführen: 8 vs 4
- Etwa 40% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.90 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- Etwa 11% höhere Kerntemperatur: 100°C vs 90°C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2866 vs 1434
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 14231 vs 3014
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1304 vs 493
- 5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 7379 vs 1490
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.90 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2866 vs 1434 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 14231 vs 3014 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1304 vs 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7379 vs 1490 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A10-9700E
- 2.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.113 vs 9.416
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 248.331 vs 195.33
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.246 vs 1.2
- 4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.505 vs 6.168
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.999 vs 17.505
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 vs 9.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 vs 195.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 vs 1.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 vs 6.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 vs 17.505 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-9700KF
CPU 2: AMD PRO A10-9700E
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-9700KF | AMD PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2866 | 1434 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 14231 | 3014 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1304 | 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7379 | 1490 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 5878 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.416 | 15.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.33 | 248.331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 1.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.168 | 24.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.505 | 74.999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1368 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1368 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4350 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i7-9700KF | AMD PRO A10-9700E | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Coffee Lake | |
| Startdatum | Q1'19 | 3 October 2016 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1274 | 1247 |
| Processor Number | i7-9700KF | |
| Serie | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | AD970BAHM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.60 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.90 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 8 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 128 GB | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2666 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1151 | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D (130W) | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 847 MHz | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | R7 | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i7-9700KF mit anderen
IntelCore i7-9700KF vs
IntelCore i7-4770S
IntelCore i7-9700KF vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B
IntelCore i7-9700KF vs
IntelCore i3-8300T
IntelCore i7-9700KF vs
AMDPRO A6-8550B
IntelCore i7-9700KF vs
IntelCore i5-5675C
IntelCore i7-9700KF vs
AMDAthlon 3000G
