Intel Core m3-7Y30 vs Intel Core i5-5287U
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core m3-7Y30 und Intel Core i5-5287U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core m3-7Y30
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- Etwa {Prozent}% mehr L3 Cache; weitere Daten können im Cache L3 gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- 5.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 4.5 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2762 vs 773
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 5338 vs 1665
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.689 vs 2.231
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 30 August 2016 vs 6 January 2015 |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB vs 3 MB |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 28 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2762 vs 773 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5338 vs 1665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.689 vs 2.231 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-5287U
- Etwa 27% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.30 GHz vs 2.60 GHz
- Etwa 5% höhere Kerntemperatur: 105°C vs 100°C
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1933 vs 1400
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3090 vs 2577
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 40.691 vs 29.007
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.279 vs 0.213
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1539 vs 1357
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1300 vs 1183
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2823 vs 2190
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1539 vs 1357
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1300 vs 1183
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2823 vs 2190
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.30 GHz vs 2.60 GHz |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1933 vs 1400 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3090 vs 2577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 40.691 vs 29.007 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.279 vs 0.213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1539 vs 1357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1300 vs 1183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2823 vs 2190 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1539 vs 1357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1300 vs 1183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2823 vs 2190 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core m3-7Y30
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-5287U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core m3-7Y30 | Intel Core i5-5287U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1400 | 1933 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2577 | 3090 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2762 | 773 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5338 | 1665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.689 | 2.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.007 | 40.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.213 | 0.279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.308 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.871 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1357 | 1539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1183 | 1300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2190 | 2823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1357 | 1539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1183 | 1300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2190 | 2823 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core m3-7Y30 | Intel Core i5-5287U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Kaby Lake | Broadwell |
| Startdatum | 30 August 2016 | 6 January 2015 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $281 | $315 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1799 | 1802 |
| Processor Number | M3-7Y30 | i5-5287U |
| Serie | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ m Processors | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.00 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 3 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 105°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.60 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Matrizengröße | 133 mm | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1900 Million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 29.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1600/1866 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x591E | 0x162B |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 900 MHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 900 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 615 | Intel® Iris® Graphics 6100 |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 2560X1600@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 3.75 W | 23 W |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Configurable TDP-up | 7 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.60 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 20.5mm X 16.5mm | 40mm x24mm x 1.3mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1515 | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 28 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 10 | 12 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 4x1, 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core m3-7Y30 mit anderen
IntelCore m3-7Y30 vs
IntelCore i5-3320M
IntelCore m3-7Y30 vs
IntelCore i7-5500U
IntelCore m3-7Y30 vs
IntelCore i5-5287U
IntelCore m3-7Y30 vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore m3-7Y30 vs
AMDR-272F
IntelCore m3-7Y30 vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1500B
