Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y vs Intel Core i5-7360U
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y und Intel Core i5-7360U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Monat(e) später
- 2.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 6.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.267 vs 2.725
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 201.508 vs 46.815
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.364
- 9.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.298 vs 1.283
- 7.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.529 vs 3.163
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 21 April 2017 vs 3 January 2017 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.267 vs 2.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 201.508 vs 46.815 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 vs 0.364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.298 vs 1.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.529 vs 3.163 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-7360U
- Etwa 125% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.60 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- 2x mehr L3 Cache, mehr Daten können im L3 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2095 vs 864
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3840 vs 1583
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 905 vs 368
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2046 vs 886
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2570 vs 1341
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2485 vs 2395
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4402 vs 3354
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2570 vs 1341
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2485 vs 2395
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4402 vs 3354
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.60 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2095 vs 864 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3840 vs 1583 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 905 vs 368 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2046 vs 886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2570 vs 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2485 vs 2395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4402 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2570 vs 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2485 vs 2395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4402 vs 3354 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-7360U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y | Intel Core i5-7360U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 864 | 2095 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1583 | 3840 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 368 | 905 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 886 | 2046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.267 | 2.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 201.508 | 46.815 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | 0.364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.298 | 1.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.529 | 3.163 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1341 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2395 | 2485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 4402 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1341 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2395 | 2485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 4402 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y | Intel Core i5-7360U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Kaby Lake | Kaby Lake |
| Startdatum | 21 April 2017 | 3 January 2017 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $161 | $304 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1480 | 1486 |
| Processor Number | 4415Y | i5-7360U |
| Serie | Intel® Pentium® Processor 4000 Series | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s QPI | 4 GT/s OPI |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 1.6 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 29.8 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x591E | 0x5926 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 850 MHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 615 | Intel® Iris® Plus Graphics 640 |
| eDRAM | 64 MB | |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@30Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 4.5 W | 9.5 W |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 20mm X 16.5mm | 42x24x1.3 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1515 | FCBGA1356 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 10 | 12 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y mit anderen
IntelPentium Gold 4415Y vs
IntelCore i7-4770TE
IntelPentium Gold 4415Y vs
IntelXeon E3-1535M v5
IntelPentium Gold 4415Y vs
IntelCore i5-7360U
IntelPentium Gold 4415Y vs
AMDEPYC 3201
IntelPentium Gold 4415Y vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1404I
IntelPentium Gold 4415Y vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1600
