NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs Intel HD Graphics 5500
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) und Intel HD Graphics 5500 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- 12.3x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1228 MHz vs 100 MHz
- Etwa 76% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1670 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 16x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 24
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 vs 594
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 230
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 vs 2262
- 10.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 vs 3.422
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 vs 781
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 754
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 1397
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 vs 781
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 754
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 1397
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 17 May 2017 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1228 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1670 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 vs 594 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 vs 230 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 vs 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 vs 3.422 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 1397 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 5500
- 2x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.811 vs 170.785
- 6.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 233 vs 35
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 vs 170.785 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 vs 35 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 594 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 230 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 195.811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 233 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Pascal | Generation 8.0 |
| Codename | N17P-G1 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Startdatum | 17 May 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 874 | 1478 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $59.99 | |
| Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1670 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1228 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 24 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,300 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 6000 MHz | |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 1 |
Technologien |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x1 | |

