NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) und NVIDIA GeForce MX150 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Etwa 31% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1228 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Etwa 61% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1670 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Etwa 20% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 vs 2259
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 213
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 vs 9584
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 vs 145.794
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1228 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1670 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 vs 2259 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 vs 213 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 vs 9584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 vs 145.794 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- 3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 10 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 36.898
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 170.785
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 1.373
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 18.937
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 3629
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3684
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3331
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 3629
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3684
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3331
- 28.5x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 35
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 vs 36.898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 vs 170.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 vs 1.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 vs 18.937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 vs 35 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 2259 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 213 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 9584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 45.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 495.238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 2.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 38.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 145.794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 999 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Pascal | Pascal |
| Codename | N17P-G1 | GP108 |
| Startdatum | 17 May 2017 | 17 May 2017 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 874 | 875 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $59.99 | |
| Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1670 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1228 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 384 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,127 gflops | |
| Texturfüllrate | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,800 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
| Speicherbandbreite | 48.06 GB / s | |
Technologien |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop-Größe | large | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |

