NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21785 vs 18872
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 vs 791
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 vs 74179
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 vs 153.677
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1534.582
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 19571
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 19571
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14606 vs 13943
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 20 September 2018 vs 13 August 2018 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21785 vs 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 vs 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 vs 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 vs 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 vs 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14606 vs 13943 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Etwa 7% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Etwa 15% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 394.035
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 41.133
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 vs 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 vs 41.133 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21785 | 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14606 | 13943 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU102 | TU102 |
Startdatum | 20 September 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $999 | $6,299 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 83 | 112 |
Jetzt kaufen | $1,279.99 | |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1545 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1350 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 18,600 million | 18,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |