NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21784 vs 18872
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 vs 791
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 vs 74179
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 vs 153.677
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1534.582
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 19571
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 19571
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14606 vs 13943
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 vs 13 August 2018 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21784 vs 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 vs 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 vs 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 vs 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 vs 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14606 vs 13943 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 394.035
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 41.133
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 vs 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 vs 41.133 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21784 | 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14606 | 13943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU102 | TU102 |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $6,299 |
Place in performance rating | 83 | 112 |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |