NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 34% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1350 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Etwa 29% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1545 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 vs 19862
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 928 vs 880
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 21578
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3652
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3290
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 21578
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3652
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3290
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 20 September 2018 vs 13 August 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1350 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1545 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 vs 19862 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 vs 880 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3290 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 147317 vs 134929
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 394.035
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 5461.22
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 41.104
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 174.185
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1987.605
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 147317 vs 134929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 1987.605 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 | 19862 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 | 880 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 | 147317 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | 6432.348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU102 | TU102 |
Startdatum | 20 September 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $999 | $9,999 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 91 | 96 |
Jetzt kaufen | $1,279.99 | |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1545 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1350 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 18,600 million | 18,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |