NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21787 versus 19370
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 936 versus 869
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138717 versus 137748
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 21578
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3290
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 21578
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3290
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 versus 13 August 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21787 versus 19370 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 936 versus 869 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138717 versus 137748 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 394.035
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 5461.22
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 41.133
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 173.697
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1987.605
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1987.605 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21787 | 19370 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 936 | 869 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138717 | 137748 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | 6432.348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14599 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU102 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $9,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 83 | 103 |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |