NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 und NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 32% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1620 MHz vs 1230 MHz
- Etwa 32% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1815 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Etwa 25% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16059 vs 8260
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 vs 327
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 9969
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3521
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 9969
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3521
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 vs 27 March 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1620 MHz vs 1230 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16059 vs 8260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 vs 327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3521 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163779 vs 105171
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 592.008 vs 226.447
- Etwa 82% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 46.266 vs 25.476
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 vs 118.544
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2169.759 vs 1106.12
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163779 vs 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 vs 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 vs 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 vs 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 vs 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16059 | 8260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 327 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 163779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | 592.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 46.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | 271.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | 2169.759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Volta |
Codename | TU104 | GV100 |
Startdatum | 13 August 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 154 | 155 |
Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1620 MHz | 1230 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 14,131 gflops | |
Leitungssysteme | 5120 | |
Texturfüllrate | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 897.0 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 4096 Bit | |
Speichertyp | HBM2 |