NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1230 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 vs 8260
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 327
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 9969
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3521
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 9969
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3521
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 27 March 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1230 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 vs 8260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3521 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163637 vs 105171
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 592.008 vs 270.203
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 46.266 vs 26.999
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 vs 110.761
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2169.759 vs 1370.281
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163637 vs 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 vs 270.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 vs 26.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 vs 110.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 vs 1370.281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 | 8260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 327 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 163637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | 592.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | 46.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | 271.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | 2169.759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 9969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU104 | GV100 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Place in performance rating | 138 | 155 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1230 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 |