AMD 3015Ce vs AMD A8-3500M

Comparative analysis of AMD 3015Ce and AMD A8-3500M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD 3015Ce

• CPU is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
• 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1337 vs 813
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2099 vs 1400

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3500M

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
• 2.7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD 3015Ce
CPU 2: AMD A8-3500M

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1337 813
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2099 1400

Compare specifications (specs)