AMD A4-3305M vs AMD Athlon 64 TF-20

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3305M and AMD Athlon 64 TF-20 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3305M

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 56% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
• 4096x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 837 vs 454
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 758 vs 265

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 TF-20

• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 687 vs 277
• Around 38% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 660 vs 478

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-3305M
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 TF-20

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	837 454
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	758 265
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	277 687
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	478 660

Compare specifications (specs)