AMD A4-6320 vs AMD Phenom II X3 B75

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-6320 and AMD Phenom II X3 B75 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-6320

• Around 33% higher clock speed: 4 GHz vs 3 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
• Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1529 vs 1248
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2081 vs 1905

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X3 B75

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
• 1 more threads: 3 vs 2
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1764 vs 1530
• Around 53% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4439 vs 2905

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-6320
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X3 B75

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1529 1248
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1530 1764
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2081 1905
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2905 4439

Compare specifications (specs)