AMD A6-3620 vs AMD Phenom II X4 B93
Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3620 and AMD Phenom II X4 B93 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3620
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Launch date | December 2011 vs October 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 B93
- Around 27% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1142 vs 982
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2159 vs 1864
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1142 vs 982 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2159 vs 1864 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A6-3620
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 B93
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD A6-3620 | AMD Phenom II X4 B93 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 982 | 1142 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1864 | 2159 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 310 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1007 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.783 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.805 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.162 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.488 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2231 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2231 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3912 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A6-3620 | AMD Phenom II X4 B93 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Llano | Deneb |
Launch date | December 2011 | October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 2091 | 2101 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 228 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 758 million |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FM1 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |