AMD A6-9210 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-9210 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-9210

• CPU is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 1.73 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400

• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 900 vs 356
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1481 vs 560

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-9210
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	356 900
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	560 1481

Compare specifications (specs)