AMD A8-3520M vs AMD Turion II Ultra M600
Comparative analysis of AMD A8-3520M and AMD Turion II Ultra M600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3520M
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1448 vs 955
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.221 vs 1.254
- 51.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 168.603 vs 3.259
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.297 vs 0.072
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2011 vs 10 September 2009 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2048 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1448 vs 955 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.221 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.603 vs 3.259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.297 vs 0.072 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II Ultra M600
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 987 vs 845
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1442 vs 274
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2456 vs 798
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 987 vs 845 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1442 vs 274 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2456 vs 798 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A8-3520M
CPU 2: AMD Turion II Ultra M600
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD A8-3520M | AMD Turion II Ultra M600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 845 | 987 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1448 | 955 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 274 | 1442 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 798 | 2456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.221 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.603 | 3.259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.297 | 0.072 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A8-3520M | AMD Turion II Ultra M600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Llano | Caspian |
Launch date | 1 October 2011 | 10 September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 2582 | 2588 |
Series | AMD A-Series | AMD Turion II Ultra |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 218 mm | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2048 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 1000 Million | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 3600 MHz | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FS1 | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
PowerNow |