AMD A8-3870K vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Comparative analysis of AMD A8-3870K and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3870K

  • CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
  • 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 93% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2340 vs 1210
  • Around 59% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1172 vs 738
  • 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.914 vs 0.33
  • Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.191 vs 0.099
  • Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.344 vs 2.408
Specifications (specs)
Launch date December 2011 vs January 2008
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 45 nm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 2340 vs 1210
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1172 vs 738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.914 vs 0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.191 vs 0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.344 vs 2.408

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

  • Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1234 vs 1213
  • Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 422 vs 373
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 9.482
  • Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.68 vs 0.4
Specifications (specs)
L2 cache 6144 KB vs 1024 KB (per core)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1234 vs 1213
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 422 vs 373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 26.311 vs 9.482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.68 vs 0.4

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A8-3870K
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1213
1234
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
2340
1210
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
373
422
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1172
738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
2.914
0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
9.482
26.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.191
0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.4
0.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.344
2.408
Name AMD A8-3870K Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
PassMark - Single thread mark 1213 1234
PassMark - CPU mark 2340 1210
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 373 422
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1172 738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.914 0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 9.482 26.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.191 0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.4 0.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.344 2.408
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 762
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 762
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1721
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 2400

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD A8-3870K Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Essentials

Architecture codename Llano Wolfdale
Launch date December 2011 January 2008
Place in performance rating 2560 2981
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Price now $129.95
Processor Number E8400
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 4.87

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 228 mm 107 mm2
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB (per core) 6144 KB
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 45 nm
Maximum frequency 3 GHz 3 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Transistor count 1178 million 410 million
Unlocked
Base frequency 3.00 GHz
Bus Speed 1333 MHz FSB
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C
Maximum core temperature 72.4°C
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3 DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported FM1 LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring