AMD A8-7410 vs AMD E2-3000M

Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7410 and AMD E2-3000M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-7410

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 805 vs 731
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1818 vs 668

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3000M

• 4.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1174 vs 262
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1887 vs 781

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A8-7410
CPU 2: AMD E2-3000M

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	805 731
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1818 668
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	262 1174
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	781 1887

Compare specifications (specs)