AMD A8-7410 vs AMD A6-3420M
Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7410 and AMD A6-3420M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-7410
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 805 vs 772
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1818 vs 1293
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6.553 vs 4.751
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.405 vs 6.257
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 661 vs 590
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1234 vs 1219
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 661 vs 590
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1234 vs 1219
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 May 2015 vs 15 June 2011 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 805 vs 772 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1818 vs 1293 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 262 vs 261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.553 vs 4.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.405 vs 6.257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 661 vs 590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1234 vs 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 661 vs 590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1234 vs 1219 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3420M
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 788 vs 781
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.561 vs 2.521
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.131 vs 0.116
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.581 vs 22.317
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3961 vs 3706
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3961 vs 3706
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 788 vs 781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.561 vs 2.521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.131 vs 0.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.581 vs 22.317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3961 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3961 vs 3706 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A8-7410
CPU 2: AMD A6-3420M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A8-7410 | AMD A6-3420M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 805 | 772 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1818 | 1293 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 262 | 261 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 781 | 788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.521 | 2.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.553 | 4.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.116 | 0.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.405 | 6.257 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.317 | 23.581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 661 | 590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1234 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3706 | 3961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 661 | 590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1234 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3706 | 3961 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A8-7410 | AMD A6-3420M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Carrizo-L | Llano |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 7 May 2015 | 15 June 2011 |
| OPN Tray | AM7410JBY44JB | |
| Place in performance rating | 2259 | 2272 |
| Series | AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A-Series |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.2 GHz | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 930 Million | 1000 Million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Die size | 218 mm | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 847 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | FP4 | FS1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A8-7410 with others
AMDA8-7410 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core T1400
AMDA8-7410 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T5900
AMDA8-7410 vs
AMDE2-3000M
AMDA8-7410 vs
AMDA6-3420M
AMDA8-7410 vs
AMDA6-9220C
AMDA8-7410 vs
IntelAtom x5-E3940
