AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i3-2332M

Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9425 and Intel Core i3-2332M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD A9-9425

vs

Intel Core i3-2332M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9425

• Around 68% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1331 vs 936
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1527 vs 1353

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A9-9425
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-2332M

Compare specifications (specs)