AMD RX-427BB vs AMD A9-9425
Comparative analysis of AMD RX-427BB and AMD A9-9425 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD RX-427BB
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 97197% higher clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3.7 GHz
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1702 vs 943
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1809 vs 1243
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5750 vs 3556
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1702 vs 943
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1809 vs 1243
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5750 vs 3556
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3600 MHz vs 3.7 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 vs 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 vs 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 vs 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 vs 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 vs 3556 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9425
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.781 vs 3.913
- 9.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.324 vs 12.202
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.615 vs 0.185
- 24.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.577 vs 0.562
- 11.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.717 vs 3.551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 vs 3.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 vs 12.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 vs 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.577 vs 0.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 vs 3.551 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD RX-427BB
CPU 2: AMD A9-9425
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD RX-427BB | AMD A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.913 | 7.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.202 | 112.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 | 0.615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.562 | 13.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.551 | 40.717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 | 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 | 3556 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1319 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1512 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD RX-427BB | AMD A9-9425 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bald Eagle | Stoney Ridge |
| Family | AMD R-Series | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Launch date | 20 May 2014 | 2Q18 |
| Place in performance rating | 1610 | 1560 |
| Processor Number | RX-427BB | |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Laptop |
| OPN Tray | AM9425AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Series | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2700 MHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Die size | 928 mm2 | 124 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3600 MHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 686 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Number of pipelines | 512 | |
| Processor graphics | Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 4 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 30-35 Watt | 10-15 Watt |
| Package Size | micro-BGA | |
| Sockets supported | BGA (FP3) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD RX-427BB with others
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelCore i7-4710MQ
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelCore i7-8809G
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelXeon E5-2648L v4
AMDRX-427BB vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
AMDRX-427BB vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
AMDRX-427BB vs
AppleA9X
