AMD Athlon 64 3200+ vs AMD Athlon XP 1900+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 3200+ and AMD Athlon XP 1900+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3200+
- Around 38% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 577 vs 312
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 491 vs 203
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
L2 cache | 512 KB vs 256 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 577 vs 312 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 491 vs 203 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1900+
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 89 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 3200+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 1900+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon 64 3200+ | AMD Athlon XP 1900+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 577 | 312 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 491 | 203 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 196 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 197 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.26 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ | AMD Athlon XP 1900+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Clawhammer | Thoroughbred |
Launch date | January 2001 | January 2001 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $150 | |
Place in performance rating | 3232 | 3233 |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.97 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 193 mm | 80 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 105 million | 37 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 754 | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt | 53 Watt |