AMD Athlon 64 4000+ vs AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 4000+ and AMD Athlon 64 3400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 4000+

  • CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 90 nm vs 130 nm
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 677 vs 652
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 608 vs 545
Specifications (specs)
Launch date October 2004 vs January 2001
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm vs 130 nm
L2 cache 1024 KB vs 512 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 677 vs 652
PassMark - CPU mark 608 vs 545

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 4000+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3400+

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
677
652
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
608
545
Name AMD Athlon 64 4000+ AMD Athlon 64 3400+
PassMark - Single thread mark 677 652
PassMark - CPU mark 608 545

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon 64 4000+ AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Essentials

Architecture codename San Diego Clawhammer
Launch date October 2004 January 2001
Launch price (MSRP) $160
Place in performance rating 2745 2772
Price now $11.99
Value for money (0-100) 14.88
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 115 mm 193 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 105 million 105 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 939 754
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 89 Watt 89 Watt