AMD Athlon 64 4000+ vs AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 4000+ and AMD Athlon 64 3400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 4000+
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 90 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 677 vs 652
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 608 vs 545
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2004 vs January 2001 |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 677 vs 652 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 608 vs 545 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 4000+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3400+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon 64 4000+ | AMD Athlon 64 3400+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 677 | 652 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 608 | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 4000+ | AMD Athlon 64 3400+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | San Diego | Clawhammer |
Launch date | October 2004 | January 2001 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Place in performance rating | 2745 | 2772 |
Price now | $11.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.88 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 115 mm | 193 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 105 million | 105 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 939 | 754 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt | 89 Watt |