AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE SFF vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE SFF and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE SFF
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE SFF | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Windsor | Windsor |
| Launch date | May 2006 | May 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 220 mm | 220 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 154 million | 154 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM2 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE SFF with others
AMDAthlon 64 X2 3800+ EE SFF vs
AMDAthlon 64 X2 4200+
AMDAthlon 64 X2 3800+ EE SFF vs
AMDAthlon 64 X2 4000+ EE
AMDAthlon 64 X2 3800+ EE SFF vs
AMDAthlon 64 X2 4000+
