AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE vs AMD Sempron 3400+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE and AMD Sempron 3400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 835 vs 346
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 720 vs 292
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB vs 256 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 835 vs 346 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 720 vs 292 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3400+
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3400+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE | AMD Sempron 3400+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 835 | 346 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 720 | 292 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 222 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 397 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.042 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE | AMD Sempron 3400+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Windsor | Manila |
Launch date | May 2006 | May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 3213 | 3208 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | |
Price now | $29.91 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.46 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 220 mm | 103 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 154 million | 81 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 62 Watt |