AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 89% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 419 vs 222
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1396 vs 397
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.993 vs 0.708
- 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.511 vs 1.445
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.196 vs 0.042
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | April 2009 vs May 2006 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 419 vs 222 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1396 vs 397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.993 vs 0.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.511 vs 1.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.196 vs 0.042 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE |
---|---|---|
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 419 | 222 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1396 | 397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.993 | 0.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.511 | 1.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.196 | 0.042 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.178 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 835 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Deneb | Windsor |
Launch date | April 2009 | May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 3218 | 3213 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 258 mm | 220 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 758 million | 154 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |