AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • Around 33% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 89% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 419 vs 222
  • 3.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1396 vs 397
  • 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.993 vs 0.708
  • 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.511 vs 1.445
  • 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.196 vs 0.042
Specifications (specs)
Launch date April 2009 vs May 2006
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 90 nm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 419 vs 222
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1396 vs 397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.993 vs 0.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 11.511 vs 1.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.196 vs 0.042

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE

  • Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 125 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE

Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
419
222
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1396
397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.993
0.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
11.511
1.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.196
0.042
Name AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 419 222
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1396 397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.993 0.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 11.511 1.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.196 0.042
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.178
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 0
PassMark - Single thread mark 835
PassMark - CPU mark 720

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ EE

Essentials

Architecture codename Deneb Windsor
Launch date April 2009 May 2006
Place in performance rating 3218 3213
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 258 mm 220 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 256 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 512 KB
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 3.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Transistor count 758 million 154 million
Unlocked

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3 AM2
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt