AMD Athlon 800 vs AMD Athlon 900
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 800 and AMD Athlon 900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 800
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 900
- Around 13% higher clock speed: 0.9 GHz vs 0.8 GHz
Maximum frequency | 0.9 GHz vs 0.8 GHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 800 | AMD Athlon 900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thunderbird | Thunderbird |
Launch date | June 2000 | June 2000 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Die size | 120 mm | 120 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 180 nm |
Maximum frequency | 0.8 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 37 million | 37 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR1 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | A | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |