AMD Athlon II Neo K125 vs AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II Neo K125 and AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K125

• CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher clock speed: 1.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 18 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 616 vs 570
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 823 vs 786

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 529 vs 315
• Around 61% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1289 vs 799

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II Neo K125
CPU 2: AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	616 570
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	315 529
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	823 786
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	799 1289

Compare specifications (specs)