AMD Athlon II Neo K125 vs AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II Neo K125 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K125

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher clock speed: 1.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 31 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 616 vs 541
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 823 vs 795

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 474 vs 315
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1357 vs 799

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II Neo K125
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	616 541
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	315 474
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	823 795
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	799 1357

Compare specifications (specs)