AMD Athlon II Neo K325 vs AMD Turion II P540

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II Neo K325 and AMD Turion II P540 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K325

• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 25 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 736 vs 309
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1235 vs 594

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II P540

• Around 85% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 93% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 937 vs 486
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 954 vs 417

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II Neo K325
CPU 2: AMD Turion II P540

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	486 937
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	417 954
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	736 309
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1235 594

Compare specifications (specs)