AMD Athlon II Neo K325 vs Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II Neo K325 and Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K325

• CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
• 32x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 70 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 417 vs 347

Reasons to consider the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

• Around 136% higher clock speed: 3.07 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 657 vs 486

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II Neo K325
CPU 2: Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	486 657
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	417 347

Compare specifications (specs)