AMD Athlon II Neo K325 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II Neo K325 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K325

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

• Around 44% higher clock speed: 1.87 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 661 vs 486
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 548 vs 417

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II Neo K325
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	486 661
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	417 548

Compare specifications (specs)