AMD Athlon II Neo K345 vs AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II Neo K345 and AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K345

• CPU is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 527 vs 365

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+

• Around 57% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 561 vs 552

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II Neo K345
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	552 561
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	527 365

Compare specifications (specs)