AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon Neo MV-40

• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 4.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 777 vs 165
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 719 vs 295

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 31% higher clock speed: 2.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 731 vs 485
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 624 vs 275

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	485 731
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	275 624
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	777 165
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	719 295

Compare specifications (specs)