AMD Athlon XP 1600+ vs AMD Sempron 2200+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP 1600+ and AMD Sempron 2200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1600+
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 62 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 2200+
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 1.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 279 vs 265
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 184 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 279 vs 265 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 184 vs 174 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP 1600+
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 2200+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon XP 1600+ | AMD Sempron 2200+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 265 | 279 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 174 | 184 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon XP 1600+ | AMD Sempron 2200+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thoroughbred | Barton |
Launch date | January 2001 | January 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 3263 | 3258 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | |
Price now | $29.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.76 | |
Performance |
||
Die size | 80 mm | 101 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 37 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | A | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 62 Watt |