AMD Athlon XP 1700+ vs AMD Sempron 2200+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP 1700+ and AMD Sempron 2200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1700+
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 62 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 2200+
- Around 2% higher clock speed: 1.5 GHz vs 1.47 GHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 279 vs 272
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 184 vs 176
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz vs 1.47 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 279 vs 272 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 184 vs 176 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP 1700+
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 2200+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon XP 1700+ | AMD Sempron 2200+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 272 | 279 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 176 | 184 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon XP 1700+ | AMD Sempron 2200+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Thoroughbred | Barton |
| Launch date | January 2001 | January 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | 3269 | 3270 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | |
| Price now | $29.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.76 | |
Performance |
||
| Die size | 80 mm | 101 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.47 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 37 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | A | A |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 62 Watt |
