AMD Athlon XP 1600+ vs AMD Athlon XP 1700+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP 1600+ and AMD Athlon XP 1700+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1600+
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1700+
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 1.47 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 272 vs 265
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 176 vs 174
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.47 GHz vs 1.4 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 272 vs 265 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 176 vs 174 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP 1600+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 1700+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon XP 1600+ | AMD Athlon XP 1700+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 265 | 272 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 174 | 176 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon XP 1600+ | AMD Athlon XP 1700+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Thoroughbred | Thoroughbred |
| Launch date | January 2001 | January 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | 3275 | 3269 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Die size | 80 mm | 80 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.4 GHz | 1.47 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 37 million | 37 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | A | A |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 50 Watt |
