AMD Athlon XP 1900+ vs AMD Sempron 2400+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP 1900+ and AMD Sempron 2400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1900+
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 62 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 2400+
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 1.67 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 321 vs 312
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 205 vs 203
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.67 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 321 vs 312 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 205 vs 203 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP 1900+
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 2400+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon XP 1900+ | AMD Sempron 2400+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 312 | 321 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 203 | 205 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon XP 1900+ | AMD Sempron 2400+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thoroughbred | Barton |
Launch date | January 2001 | January 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 3233 | 3225 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $27 | |
Price now | $27 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.42 | |
Performance |
||
Die size | 80 mm | 101 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 37 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | A | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 62 Watt |