AMD E1-2100 vs AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-2100 and AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-2100

• CPU is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 130 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 407 vs 370

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+

• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 577 vs 323

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-2100
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	323 577
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	407 370

Compare specifications (specs)