AMD E1-2100 vs Intel Celeron M 900

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-2100 and Intel Celeron M 900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD E1-2100

vs

Intel Celeron M 900

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-2100

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
• 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 323 vs 263
• 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 408 vs 204

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-2100
CPU 2: Intel Celeron M 900

Compare specifications (specs)