AMD E1-2500 vs AMD Athlon II X2 250
Comparative analysis of AMD E1-2500 and AMD Athlon II X2 250 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E1-2500
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.416 vs 0.343
- 12.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 62.654 vs 5.142
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.17 vs 0.089
- 27.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.002 vs 0.184
- 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.81 vs 1.714
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs June 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.416 vs 0.343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.654 vs 5.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.17 vs 0.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.002 vs 0.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.81 vs 1.714 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 250
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1199 vs 450
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1170 vs 590
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 357 vs 149
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 642 vs 261
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1199 vs 450 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1170 vs 590 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 vs 149 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 642 vs 261 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E1-2500
CPU 2: AMD Athlon II X2 250
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD E1-2500 | AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 450 | 1199 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 590 | 1170 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 149 | 357 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 261 | 642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.416 | 0.343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.654 | 5.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.17 | 0.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.002 | 0.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.81 | 1.714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 390 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2470 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 390 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2470 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E1-2500 | AMD Athlon II X2 250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Kabini | Regor |
Family | AMD E-Series Processors | |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 | June 2009 |
OPN Tray | EM2500BJ23HM | |
Place in performance rating | 2671 | 3204 |
Series | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops | |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39 | |
Price now | $189.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.70 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.4 GHz | |
Die size | 246 mm | 117 mm |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2048 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 410 million |
Unlocked | ||
L1 cache | 256 KB | |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | |
Supported memory types | Not Listed | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8240 | |
Switchable graphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FT3 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |