AMD E1-6010 vs AMD Phenom II X4 N970

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-6010 and AMD Phenom II X4 N970 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-6010

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 N970

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 904 vs 424
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1687 vs 532
• Around 80% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 256 vs 142
• 3.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 930 vs 250

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-6010
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 N970

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	424 904
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	532 1687
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	142 256
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	250 930

Compare specifications (specs)