AMD E1-6010 vs Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-6010 and Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-6010

• CPU is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 130 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 7x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 70 Watt
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 536 vs 347

Reasons to consider the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 657 vs 426

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-6010
CPU 2: Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	426 657
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	536 347

Compare specifications (specs)