AMD E2-7110 vs Intel Celeron N3050
Comparative analysis of AMD E2-7110 and Intel Celeron N3050 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E2-7110
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 610 vs 555
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1510 vs 591
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 205 vs 186
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 664 vs 339
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.23 vs 1.169
- 20.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 101.163 vs 4.85
- 25x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.252 vs 0.25
- 28.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.962 vs 0.666
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 577 vs 515
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3049 vs 2267
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 577 vs 515
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3049 vs 2267
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 May 2015 vs 1 April 2015 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 610 vs 555 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1510 vs 591 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 205 vs 186 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 664 vs 339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.23 vs 1.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 vs 4.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 vs 0.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 vs 0.666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 vs 515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 vs 2267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 vs 515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 vs 2267 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N3050
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 2.16 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 10.8x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.435 vs 0.354
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1428 vs 1098
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1428 vs 1098
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.16 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.435 vs 0.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1428 vs 1098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1428 vs 1098 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E2-7110
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N3050
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD E2-7110 | Intel Celeron N3050 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 610 | 555 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1510 | 591 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 205 | 186 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 664 | 339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.23 | 1.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 | 4.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.354 | 0.435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 | 0.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 | 0.666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 | 515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | 1428 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 2267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 | 515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 | 1428 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 2267 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD E2-7110 | Intel Celeron N3050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Carrizo-L | Braswell |
| Family | AMD E-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 7 May 2015 | 1 April 2015 |
| OPN Tray | EM7110JBY44JB | |
| Place in performance rating | 2327 | 2670 |
| Series | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Price now | $119.42 | |
| Processor Number | N3050 | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.17 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 930 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 320 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | FP4, FT3b | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD E2-7110 with others
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDTurion X2 Ultra ZM-84
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelCore i3-2332M
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDA10-7300
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDA9-9420e
